Showing posts with label Downtown Publications. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Downtown Publications. Show all posts

Friday, March 25, 2016

Nepotism policy - Update to blog

Hi All,
I have lots to share about the upcoming 3/28/16 Board of Trustees meeting at Bloomfield Township. 
Let's start with:

4/8/16:  UPDATE: my opinion and facts:   
Nepotism... while alive and well in Bloomfield Township,  is something the "leadership" refuses to address and enforce.  Employees and "leadership":  many seek out and embrace the hiring of  "friends and family" for full, part-time, seasonal, election, and vendor jobs.   The employees are basically telling the trustees who they are going to hire and what equipment they want to buy and what contractors they want to deal with. Vendor requests are often written so only one company (their preferred one) can possibly meet the requirements.  The township seeks internally first to hire (basically asking who wants the job/ or who do they know that wants the job) and generally does not make job postings to the general public in an open and transparent way.

Latest example:  Fire Chief David Piche hired his son as firefighter/paramedic in 2015.  His son, Jacob "Jake" Piche  received his official badge at this meeting.  Supervisor Savoie and the Board of Trustees knew this fact.  They did nothing to correct it. They even "danced around a known fact" at a Study Session.  The E-News from the Township didn't even acknowledge the family relationship. Even the  3/28/16 minutes of the Board meeting (shown copied below) have no mention of family relationship nor the fact that the fire chief hired his son.  The township most likely will continue to "hide and deny" their failure to enforce a nepotism policy that is meaningful. 
           

****BACK TO THE ORIGINAL BLOG:  Nepotism Policy- Bl. Twp. Ignored?  Again?
AGENDA #2....  my comments

At a special study session on May 28, 2015....Nepotism policy was discussed in a "round-about" way.  Perhaps it was brought up because Fire Chief Piche's son, Jake, was recently hired in as a firefighter/paramedic first year/trainee.   That name, Jake Piche,  however, never was mentioned at the meeting because?? public was in attendance??   the press was in attendance?  the leadership didn't want the public to know??
 
I don't know the reason.   I attended this study session meeting as a member of the public yet I had the feeling that there was a specific issue concerning nepotism, but specifics were not discussed by the Supervisor or the Trustees.
I left wondering. 
The "truth" should have been present... to fully discuss the issue as it was happening.

This is how the township recorded the 5/28/15 study session minutes for this nepotism topic:


This is how Downtown Publication Editor, Lisa Brody, described the nepotism issue heard at that same meeting: 
**  Note:  Highlights in RED in below article were added by me for emphasis: Marcia/blog writer

Nepotism policy discussed by township

By Lisa Brody
News Editor


05/29/2015 - Bloomfield Township trustees considered their existing nepotism policy at the request of trustee Dave Buckley at a study session on Thursday, May 28, concluding they have a good policy and it is best to find the most qualified candidates for open positions.

The township has a nepotism policy that was approved on February 22, 1999, "when Fred Korzon was the supervisor, Wilma Cotton was the clerk, and Dave Payne was the treasurer," supervisor Leo Savoie said. He said no family member can have direct supervision over another family member, and elected officials could not have a family member hired as a full-time employee.

He said there are about seven to ten individuals or related people that work in the same departments, notably in the police and fire departments.

"We have a couple in the police department, where people married after they were working there, and four or five in the fire department who have dads or uncles working there," Savoie said. "The policy is you cannot have direct supervisory control."

Buckley said, "In a direct reporting situation, to me that's not acceptable in Bloomfield Township. And if someone is at the top, it flows all the way. As trustees, we're responsible for setting policy."

Trustee Corinne Khederian asked why the policy was now a topic of discussion.

"We have not discussed this during my tenure. I want to give our administration – specifically the supervisor – specific direction. In an organization with police, fire, or the road department, where someone wants to follow a family member into a department, there can be a conflict of interest. Let's clear this up. As a board we can be clear for hiring practices."

For hiring, some jobs are posted online, and others are hired from within, trustees were told.

"I think the policy has been to hire the best qualified rather than on relationships at all levels of the township," said Khederian.

"Police officer kids want to grow up to be police officers; firemen kids want to grow up to be firemen; doctor's kids want to grow up to be doctors," noted Savoie.

"Nepotism is when someone is hired and they're not qualified," said clerk Jan Roncelli. "We don't have that."

"I don't like fixing something that isn't broken," said trustee Brian Kepes.

Trustees decided to continue their current nepotism policy.



Then, one month later, Lisa Brody, Editor of Downtown Publications, did a feature article on nepotism in government, June 25, 2015:

Government nepotism

Author:Lisa Brody
Date: June 25, 2015


Here are just 3 paragraphs from her 5 page article:

"The issue of nepotism arises when a relative is given a job over another qualified individual, giving rise to favoritism. Many corporations and local governments have nepotism policies included in their employee handbooks or local ordinances, in order to prevent direct supervision by a family member of another.

It's believed that nepotism decreases the job satisfaction and the morale of all of the other employees in a company or organization – other than those people benefitting from the nepotism hire. In a study of nepotism published by the International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, nepotism had a significant detrimental impact on employees' overall job satisfaction, intention to quit their job, and likelihood of their talking negatively about their job, to either co-workers or potential customers. A successful nepotism policy can ultimately improve the morale of an organization.

The existence of a nepotism policy ensures that individuals can't influence the hiring, promotion, or discipline of a relative. Policies are designed to reduce the perception of favoritism by requiring employees to disclose relevant conflicts, and by restricting that involvement with their relative if the relative is hired."


So... my opinion:
A rare discussion of nepotism policy at a study session in May 2015...  With again,  the township continuing to doing what they want which is what I call the "Family and Friends policy"... despite one Trustee's weak attempt to clarify and correct and enforce the nepotism policy if needed.

AGENDA ITEM # 2 @   Monday, March 28, 2016:  
Swearing In of Fire Department Personnel-  Lt. Kevin Bailey, Lt. Fire Inspector Ken Kowalski, Fire Marshal Peter Vlahos, and Firefighter/Paramedic:  Jake Piche

  • It takes one year of service, training and practice before being sworn in as firefighter, paramedic.  
  • Was that "round-about" nepotism discussion on May 28, 2015 because a Trustee learned of the new fire department hire a month or so earlier, Jake Piche, the Fire Chief's son?  
  • Should Supervisor Savoie have acknowledged the fire department hire and then perhaps enforced the township nepotism policy at that May 2015 meeting?  
  • Not long after this meeting, Supervisor Savoie nominated Fire Chief Dave Piche for: Fire Chief of the Year Award for 2015.    Piche won.   

What stopped the Supervisor and the Trustees back in May 2015 from revealing the truth/name about the hire and the nepotism policy?   Is it because: "Family and Friends" policy is tradition at this township?

Bottom Line:



Getting his promotion to full firefighter/ paramedic at Monday, March 28 meeting is the Fire Chief's son, Jake Piche.   I will assume he was qualified to be hired... but he should not have been hired by this township.... he should have applied at another municipality.  When his father retires, he would then be eligible to apply to this township.   While the Monday night event will be a proud moment for the chief and a happy event for the son, it should be occurring at another municipality. 

The truth is:
Fire Chief Dave Piche does have direct supervision of all the firemen...his son, Jake Piche,  included.  Policy should have prevailed.  
   
My opinion.
Marcia 

Friday, December 5, 2014

PROBLEMS with the Bloomfield Township Defined Benefit Pension Plan

HI ALL,
Here are two articles written by Lisa Brody of Downtown Birmingham/Bloomfield Publications on the township issues related to the PENSION PLAN. (see specific article links below)

I really think you should read them... and realize that there is much more to the story that needs to be uncovered...and soon.

Lisa Brody article about Township Study Session and the financial issues surrounding the pension plan.
Here is the link:
http://www.downtownpublications.com/Articles-municipal-c-2014-12-05-219617.112113-More-concerns-over-township-investments.html

Lisa Brody
article on FOIA documents NOT given to Downtown Publications concerning issues surrounding the township pension plan.
Here is the link:
http://www.downtownpublications.com/Articles-municipal-c-2014-12-05-219618.112113-FOIA-appeal-filed-by-Downtown-Publications.html


Apparently from what I heard at the Bloomfield Township Study Session this past Tuesday, was that the Township  Prudential Pension Plan was written (1961) in a way that most likely, no other plan like it exists today. And...that is good for everyone else..not us.   The GUARANTEE to these township pensioners is apparently NOT from the Prudential plan, but continually from the township taxpayers.  MILLIONS of the bond money needs to go to Prudential this year... much more than previously mentioned... which then limits the equity the township has to invest...and this will happen most likely... each year going forward.... Unless...something can be fixed.

While this pension plan was written in 1961... MOST of our elected officials have been on the Township Board LONG ENOUGH... to have personally learned the DETAILS of the pension plans... or, should have,   as they are they ones to continually make DECISIONS on funding them.  WHERE has our ATTORNEY, Bill Hampton, been on this issue?  Hasn't his firm been with the township for approx.  30 years?   The township will be looking for township residents with extensive knowledge on pensions/investments/ etc.   to be part of a special advisory board.  Stay tuned.

I couldn't believe that Prudential Retirement representatives did NOT show up for the Study Session meeting.  Perhaps even they had to go back and reread that 1961 agreement.  Perhaps we ALL should be able to read that agreement... were there any amendments or changes to that agreement since 1961?  If yes, when?  And how?   FYI:  Apparently, something needs to be signed at the December 8, 2014 Board of Trustees meeting for the Prudential Retirement account....because of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the definition of "spouse".

Anyone may FOIA  the December 2, 2014  @ 1 pm  Study Session AUDIO TAPE.... but that MUST be done before the Study Session minutes are approved.  Once the MINUTES are approved... that audio tape MAY be destroyed.   I believe the FOIA cost is $40 for the audio tape.  The minutes will be free, when posted.
Marcia
 

Sunday, June 29, 2014

Excessive Taxes... Vote NO on Bl. Twp. Four Millages

Hi All,

$98 Million in reserves, but Bloomfield Township wants to continue high tax rates.  There is enough in reserves to retire the renewing 4 millages.   (One millage doesn't even expire until 2016)

Of the 85 Townships within the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, The Charter Township of Bloomfield, with total expenditures of $76,366,077, places 2nd  in terms of total expenditures for fiscal year 2013. The Township spent $1,859 per capita; $1,115 more than the Regional Average for Townships.

Bloomfield Township management continues to OVER SPEND.



WHY should management ask for 10 year millages... then BANK a lot of that previously collected money... and then continue to ask for more money for another 10 years claiming the township is broke?   The Bloomfield Township AAA rating is because there is money in the bank.... and some of that money is in DEDICATED funds... meaning the money may only be spent for a specific department. 

Recently, the local media has begun to weigh in on how the taxpayers should vote.  They take the Township leadership spin position.  I disagree with the Township spin.  The media gives a mere mention that I disagree.

Recently, the author of an Oakland Press article wrote this:
"Robovitsky believes that the millage is unfair because even non-members
would have to pay it. She thinks a better solution is to charge each
member of the senior center $100 per year, including non-residents who
use the center."

That statement doesn't go far enough.
The "non-members" as the author wrote it.... are the Township residents... that are NOT OLD ENOUGH  to be members of the Senior Center. Why should the younger generations have to pay the operating costs?  Everyone in the township is obligated to pay the costs for the BOND for the Senior Center building construction.

There are other "non-members" who do NOT LIVE in the township, yet benefit from our tax dollars. At the present time, they only pay $10 extra to attend programs, classes, and trips. No millage tax payments, no construction bond payments. Why is our local government giving outsiders better deals than the taxpayers?

The Senior Center leadership says there are 11,000 "profiled" members. MY suggestion was to have a FEE/ or DUES for those 11,000 "profiled" members....say $100 annually. That fee would raise $1,100,000, which would be $300,000  MORE than the millage money would generate ($800,000). The "non-members" that do NOT live in Bloomfield Township should have a fee/dues at least twice that or be excluded altogether. They can always move and live in the Township and pay the high taxes.

Why hasn't this fee/dues plan been discussed by township leadership or the senior center leadership?

Perhaps the 11,000 "profiled" members... really don't attend the center.  Perhaps part of that number is a lot of NON-residents.  Perhaps the figure of 400-500 daily usage is not really correct.  There has NEVER been, in the ten years of collecting millage money for this senior center,  an ANNUAL REPORT.  Why give another 10 years of millage money when there has been NO accounting to how the money has been spent for the last ten years?  There is $2.4 MILLION  CASH (saved from previous millage money) in the Senior Services Fund that can only be used for the senior center.  The millage brings in approx.  $800,000 a year. That means there is $2.4 Million currently SAVED  to operate the senior center for the next 2 years WITHOUT the need to raise more cash via the August 5, 2014 "stealth" election.

  •  THINK !
  • the township citizens should vote NO on this proposed millage on August 5, 2014
  • Vote NO.  The November 2016 election is the time for money issues to be on the ballot.
  • the township leadership should demand an Annual Report from the Senior Service Dept.
  • the township leadership should consider and discuss a FEE based policy to generate the approx. $800,000 revenue that is needed for employee wages/health benefits/pensions
  • MUCH of the operation of the Senior Center is via grants/fee based classes/trips  and volunteer generosity
  • the taxpayers should not be burdened with this 10 year dedicated millage
  • there is absolutely NO reason with the current funds in savings to shut down any part of this senior services for the next two years.... there is money in the bank
  • Senior Service FUND balances on March 31 at the end of the fiscal year for the years 2013, 2014, and estimated 2015  numbers from a FOIA document I obtained:
  • I recommend a NO VOTE on this and the other Bloomfield Township millages because Supervisor Savoie stated that IF all the millages fail... his 2014-2015 budget is good... no cuts needed... as I did find out with this FOIA document of  approx. $98 MILLION In FUNDS at the township:
Marcia

FYI:  
Article in Downtown Publications:
http://www.downtownpublications.com/Articles-election-c-2014-06-27-218564.112113-Our-endorsements-for-August-primary.html

Two  articles from The Oakland Press about the millages:

http://www.theoaklandpress.com/government-and-politics/20140624/bloomfield-township-safety-millage-renewals-critical-to-community

http://www.theoaklandpress.com/general-news/20140623/bloomfield-township-senior-services-millage-allows-center-to-continue-normal-operation